AI drafts the changelog from the feedback itself.
Move a Post to Completed and UserJot writes the announcement from the original report and the discussion around it. In your voice, ready to review. No one opens an empty doc on a Friday afternoon.
Marker.io alternative
The Marker.io alternative. Feature requests included. Flat pricing.
Marker.io turns a bug into a ticket in your PM tool. UserJot turns feedback into a prioritized roadmap and a published changelog, with the original reporter notified when the fix ships. Flat pricing. Unlimited users on every plan.
Powering product-led companies
Tally
OpenPanel
Scite
TensorDock
Drippi
Ghostbase
Throne
Nuelink
SuperWhisper
Drizzle
LitCommerce
StoryCut
GoodBarber
TeamBuildr
Tally
OpenPanel
Scite
TensorDock
Drippi
Ghostbase
Throne
Nuelink
SuperWhisper
Drizzle
LitCommerce
StoryCut
GoodBarber
TeamBuildr
Tally
OpenPanel
Scite
TensorDock
Drippi
Ghostbase
Throne
Nuelink
SuperWhisper
Drizzle
LitCommerce
StoryCut
GoodBarber
TeamBuildr
What UserJot is opinionated about
Four things that shape every decision.
Feedback work is craft. The tool should feel like one. These are the four commitments that shape every decision, and together they make UserJot feel like a different instrument than a bug-reporting tool.
See how we think about pricingThe loop, not the queue
Feedback becomes votes, votes become roadmap, roadmap becomes a shipped changelog. Each stage moves the next on its own. A bug queue is one slice of that picture.
Designed end to end
Portal, widget, dashboard, emails, mobile. Every touchpoint drawn by the same hand, with the same standards. The product looks current for your team and for the people it reaches.
One price for all your users
Flat monthly pricing with unlimited users on every paid plan. Invite clients, prospects, internal teams. The bill never tracks your engagement.
The reporter hears when you ship
The person who asked for the fix is on the announcement list automatically. Shipped work closes the loop it opened. No distribution list to build.
We set up UserJot and our users actually started leaving feedback. Clean, simple, and we finally know what to build next.
The customer feedback platform where users vote on what ships next.
UserJot brings every customer request into one place, ranks it by the users who want it most, and turns the loop from submission to shipped feature into something your users can watch happen. Feedback, roadmap, and changelog, in one tool.
Ranked feedback board
Every request lands in one ranked board instead of getting buried across email, Slack, and support threads.
AI duplicate detection
AI surfaces similar requests as users type so votes land on one canonical post instead of splitting across duplicates.
In-app widget
Embed feedback collection directly inside your product so users can submit ideas without leaving the page.
Status-change emails
When a request moves to Review, Planned, or In Progress, every voter gets the update automatically.
Weekly digest
Top new requests worth voting on arrive in a weekly email that pulls users back into the board.
Closed-loop updates
The moment a feature ships, voters hear about it through the changelog and the feedback loop closes itself.
The loop
What happens after a user submits.
Marker.io's job ends when the ticket lands in your PM tool. UserJot's work is just beginning. Every submission runs through the same four stages, and each one feeds the next without anyone reassembling the story by hand.
Users vote, comment, refine
Each submission is a public thread. Votes show intent, comments surface context, duplicates merge automatically. The signal climbs on its own.
Status tells its own story
Pending, Review, Planned, In Progress, Completed. The public roadmap updates as items move through. No separate roadmap tool to maintain in parallel.
AI drafts the announcement
When a Post moves to Completed, UserJot turns the request and the conversation into a changelog entry in your voice. Ready to review, minutes from publish.
The reporter is on the list
Everyone who voted, commented, or subscribed gets an email on publish. The person who asked for the feature or fix hears first, without any list to build.
The shape of the job
Bug tracking is one slice of feedback.
Marker.io built a great tool for one part of the picture. Here is the part UserJot was built for.
Marker.io captures a bug and routes it into your PM tool. The report is detailed, the metadata is clean, and the handoff is fast 01. That is the job Marker.io was built to do, and it does it well.
What it does not do is give the person who flagged the bug any reason to come back 02. The report goes into Jira, the user moves on, and the fix ships to the codebase. The original reporter is rarely on the distribution list for the thing they started.
UserJot takes feedback the other direction. Every submission has a status, a vote count, and a public trail. When work ships, an email reaches everyone who asked for it 03. The feedback that started the work finishes the loop.
By the numbers
Three numbers worth knowing.
What UserJot costs on day one, how many users come with it, and how long it takes to go from signup to a live board.
$0
Free forever, unlimited users
Two boards, public roadmap, public changelog, every user you want. Marker.io has a 15-day trial and no permanent free plan.
Unlimited
Users on every UserJot paid plan
Invite clients, prospects, internal teams. Marker.io Starter caps at 3 users. Extras run $13 per user per month.
30 sec
Signup to a live board
Pick a workspace name. Share the link. No configuration sits between you and the first piece of feedback.
Side by side
UserJot vs Marker.io, feature by feature.
A feature-by-feature read of where the two products diverge. Scope is the loudest difference, but pricing, user limits, and what happens after a submission matter just as much.
| Feature | UserJot | Marker.io |
|---|---|---|
| Product focus | Feedback, roadmap, and changelog loop | Visual bug reporting |
| Pricing model | Flat, by feature set | Per user, per project |
| Free plan | Unlimited users, 2 boards, forever | 15-day trial only |
| Entry tier | $29 / month, unlimited users | $39 / month, 3 users |
| Team-size tier | $59 / month, unlimited users | $149 / month, 15 users |
| Native screenshot and annotation | File attachments | Canvas with arrows and shapes |
| Console logs and network metadata | Captured automatically | |
| Session replay | Team plan | |
| 2-way PM tool sync | Linear, webhooks, REST API | Jira, Trello, GitHub (Team plan) |
| Feature requests and voting | ||
| Public roadmap | ||
| AI-drafted changelog | ||
| Voter emails on shipped features | ||
| MCP server for AI agents | ||
| Custom domain and white-label | Included on paid plans | Agency plan, $129 / month |
| Unlimited users on paid plans | 3 to 15 by tier |
Closing the loop
The person who reported the bug hears when you ship the fix.
This is the part a bug tool cannot do on its own. UserJot keeps the thread intact from first submission to published changelog, so shipped work reaches the exact people who asked for it.
No distribution list to build
Everyone who voted, commented, or subscribed is already on the announcement. The loop closes on the exact people it opened with.
Scheduled and digested
Queue announcements for when your users are awake. A weekly digest gently re-engages the quieter ones.
Changelog software with AI that writes, schedules, and notifies for you.
AI changelog software that writes updates from your shipped features, schedules posts, and auto-notifies users who requested them. The in-app widget helps users discover every release the moment you publish.
AI writes complete changelogs
Tell the AI to write a changelog from closed feedback and it drafts the post, title, and tags in your voice.
Automatic user notifications
When you publish, users who voted on those features get an email automatically. No manual list management.
In-app widget
Users can read the latest changelog without leaving your product.
Update indicator
A small badge appears the moment a new changelog lands, so users never miss what shipped.
Link to feedback
Every update links back to the original feature requests and the customers who asked for them.
Schedule posts
Ask the AI to schedule for Monday at 2pm, or let it pick the right time for your audience.
“Our strategy is to stay close to our users and obsess over quality. UserJot makes that easy: one place to listen, build what users want, and keep the feedback loop short.”
“UserJot has noticeably improved our product process. Instead of piecing together feedback from support, email, and social, we have one hub to collect feedback, gauge interest, and keep users updated on improvements. It's helped us move faster and focus on things customers actually want.”
“We set up UserJot and our users actually started leaving feedback. Clean, simple, and we finally know what to build next.”
“Ever since we added UserJot, the most common thing users mention in reviews is that we actually listen. It's helped us build a loyal community of users who feel like they're shaping the app with us.”
“We'd been looking for a feedback board for some time. Every app we found was either bloated or expensive. Userjot hits the sweet spot! The UI is next-level, and the pace of improvement has been amazing!”
Switching
Most teams move to UserJot over a week.
There is no Marker.io importer. Most teams do not want one. Bug queues rarely travel well, and a clean break is usually the point. Here is what the switch actually looks like.
Start a UserJot workspace
Thirty seconds to sign up. Pick a workspace name, drop the widget into your product with one script tag.
Let active Marker.io tickets close where they are
No data migration to fight, no state to reconcile. Existing work finishes in its home. Your team learns the new loop on fresh submissions.
Open new submissions in UserJot from day one
New feedback runs through the loop: voting, status, roadmap, changelog. By the time Marker.io winds down, UserJot has a month of real data.
If you have specific data you need to preserve, reach out. We will run a CSV import or write a one-off adapter with you.
Pricing
Pricing that does not punish adoption.
Flat monthly pricing with unlimited users on every plan. Your bill stays the same at a hundred users or ten thousand, on quiet months or loud ones.
Free
Free, forever.
$0/ month
What's included
- Unlimited posts
- Unlimited users
- 3 admin roles
- 2 feedback boards
- Public roadmap
- Public changelog
Starter
For small teams.
$29/ month
Everything in Free, plus
- Custom domain
- Guest posting
- Automatic login
- 5 feedback boards
- Private boards
- One integration
Professional
For growing teams.
$59/ month
Everything in Starter, plus
- Unlimited boards
- Advanced search
- Single sign-on
- Unlimited integrations
- Unlimited admin roles
- Public identity masking
Give it a weekend
Start a free workspace in thirty seconds.
UserJot takes about thirty seconds to stand up. If the shape of the loop fits your team, you keep it. If your job is really visual bug triage, you have spent less time than reading this page.
Start free
Free forever. No credit card. Unlimited users from day one.
Questions
The ones that come up before teams switch.
Scope differences, pricing, migration, and what UserJot does and does not do compared to Marker.io. Answered plainly.
Two different shapes. Marker.io is a visual bug reporting tool tuned for the agency-to-client and QA-to-developer handoff. UserJot is a feedback, roadmap, and changelog loop tuned for product teams talking to their own users. Both are good at what they do. They answer different questions.
Not in the same way. UserJot supports file attachments on every submission, so users can paste or upload a screenshot. We do not have an in-browser annotation canvas with arrows and shapes the way Marker.io does. If that specific capture flow is central to how your users report bugs, Marker.io is genuinely a better fit for that part of the job.
No. Automatic technical metadata capture is a debugging feature and we did not build one. Users can describe what happened and attach relevant files. Developers can post submissions through our REST API with any custom fields they want. We do not snapshot the session for you the way Marker.io does.
Not natively. We have native 2-way Linear sync, webhook-based integration with Jira and most other PM tools, and a full REST API. If your team lives inside Jira and needs round-trip status updates out of the box, Marker.io's sync is deeper than ours and will save you configuration time.
UserJot Starter is $29 per month with unlimited users. Marker.io Starter is $39 per month for 3 users, with $13 per additional user. UserJot Professional is $59 per month, still unlimited users. Marker.io Team is $149 per month for 15 users. The gap widens as the team grows. The point is not only that we are cheaper at most sizes, though we are. It is that our pricing does not change as you invite more people into the loop.
Not with a turnkey importer. We did not build one because most teams find their historical bug queue is not worth bringing forward. A typical switch looks like this: start a UserJot workspace, drop the widget into your product, let active Marker.io tickets close out where they are, and open new submissions in UserJot from day one. If you have specific data you need to preserve, reach out and we will help you move it.
If you are an agency running visual QA across many client projects, with white-label client portals and heavy PM-tool sync as part of the handoff, Marker.io is probably the better fit. UserJot supports custom domains and white-labeling on paid plans, but our loop is tuned for product teams collecting feedback from their own end users, not agencies triaging bugs across client portfolios.
Partially. QA teams can file bug reports in UserJot the same way any user can, and prioritize them with voting, statuses, and the triage action bar. UserJot does not replace a debugging tool. If your QA workflow depends on session replay and automatic metadata, pair UserJot with a dedicated debugging tool or stay with Marker.io for that part of the job.
Not in UserJot. Session replay is a dedicated product category and we did not build one. Teams who need it usually pair Marker.io or FullStory with whatever feedback loop they run.
It is part of the same system as feedback and roadmap. When you move a Post to Completed, UserJot drafts the announcement from the original request and the conversation around it, in your voice, ready to review. Publishing notifies every voter and commenter automatically, and pulses a new-update indicator in the in-app widget. The person who reported the bug hears when the fix ships.
Thirty seconds from signup to a live board. Pick a workspace name, share the link. Dropping the widget into your product is one script tag. No configuration sits between you and the first piece of feedback.