AI drafts the changelog from the feedback itself.
Move a Post to Completed and UserJot writes the announcement from the original request and the discussion around it. In your voice, ready to review. No one opens an empty doc on a Friday afternoon.
Savio alternative
The modern Savio alternative. Public boards. Unlimited editors.
Feedback, roadmap, and changelog as one designed loop. Public boards so your users participate directly, not through a CS handoff. Flat pricing with unlimited editors, no per-seat math.
Powering product-led companies
Tally
OpenPanel
Scite
TensorDock
Drippi
Ghostbase
Throne
Nuelink
SuperWhisper
Drizzle
LitCommerce
StoryCut
GoodBarber
TeamBuildr
Tally
OpenPanel
Scite
TensorDock
Drippi
Ghostbase
Throne
Nuelink
SuperWhisper
Drizzle
LitCommerce
StoryCut
GoodBarber
TeamBuildr
Tally
OpenPanel
Scite
TensorDock
Drippi
Ghostbase
Throne
Nuelink
SuperWhisper
Drizzle
LitCommerce
StoryCut
GoodBarber
TeamBuildr
What UserJot is opinionated about
Four things that shape every decision.
Feedback work is craft. The tool should feel like one. These are the four commitments that sit behind every decision, and together they make UserJot feel unmistakably lighter to run.
See how we think about pricingPublic by default
Feedback should come from the people giving it. Public boards make participation the baseline, not a by-product of your team's support queue.
Designed end to end
Portal, widget, dashboard, emails, mobile. Every touchpoint drawn by the same hand, with the same standards. The product looks current for your team and for the people it reaches.
Flat pricing, no seat math
Invite customer success. Invite support. Invite the founders. The bill does not move when your team does.
One loop, not three tools
Feedback, roadmap, and changelog share state. Shipping a feature moves the right pieces on its own. Nobody reassembles the story across surfaces.
UserJot has noticeably improved our product process. Instead of piecing together feedback from support, email, and social, we have one hub to collect feedback, gauge interest, and keep users updated on improvements. It's helped us move faster and focus on things customers actually want.
The customer feedback platform where users vote on what ships next.
UserJot brings every customer request into one place, ranks it by the users who want it most, and turns the loop from submission to shipped feature into something your users can watch happen. Feedback, roadmap, and changelog, in one tool.
Ranked feedback board
Every request lands in one ranked board instead of getting buried across email, Slack, and support threads.
AI duplicate detection
AI surfaces similar requests as users type so votes land on one canonical post instead of splitting across duplicates.
In-app widget
Embed feedback collection directly inside your product so users can submit ideas without leaving the page.
Status-change emails
When a request moves to Review, Planned, or In Progress, every voter gets the update automatically.
Weekly digest
Top new requests worth voting on arrive in a weekly email that pulls users back into the board.
Closed-loop updates
The moment a feature ships, voters hear about it through the changelog and the feedback loop closes itself.
Public engagement
A feedback board your users actually use.
Savio collects feedback from support channels and imports it internally. UserJot puts a board between your product and your customers, so feedback arrives in their words, with their votes already attached. The loop starts outside the team, not inside.
Your users, not your team
Submissions come from customers directly. No exports from Intercom, no rewriting by CS, no summaries of what someone said.
Votes, not guesses
Demand is legible at a glance. Prioritization starts with what the crowd is already asking for, not an admin's best estimate.
Embedded or standalone
Drop the widget into your app or point users at a public board. Both work from the same data, both feel native.
Guest posting, no barrier
Users can post without creating an account. The distance between an idea and a submission drops to zero.
How we think about the feedback loop
Two shapes of feedback tool.
A small distinction with large downstream effects on how the whole practice feels.
A feedback tool can be built two ways. As an inbox for what your team hears from customers 01, or as a board where customers speak for themselves. Both are valid ideas. They build very different products.
Savio is an inbox. Feedback forwards in from Intercom, Help Scout, Slack, and email, and the team curates it internally 02. The signal is filtered through people who are paid to listen. For B2B teams whose customers live in support conversations, that filtering is a feature.
UserJot is a board. Customers submit, vote, and comment in a public space 03. What reaches the team is already weighted, already conversational. Nobody inside writes up what somebody outside said. The users are in the room.
By the numbers
Three numbers worth knowing.
What UserJot costs on day one, what a ten-editor team saves, and how long it takes to go from signup to a live public board.
$0
Free forever, unlimited users
Two boards, public roadmap, public changelog, every user you want. Savio has no free plan, just a 14-day trial.
$631
Saved per month at 10 editors
A ten-editor team on Savio Business runs $690 per month. UserJot Professional covers the same team at $59.
30 sec
Signup to a live public board
Pick a workspace name. Share the link. Customers are posting before you finish inviting the team.
Side by side
UserJot vs Savio, feature by feature.
A feature-by-feature read of where the two products diverge. Public boards and pricing are the loudest differences, but design, mobile, and security end up mattering just as much.
| Feature | UserJot | Savio |
|---|---|---|
| Design philosophy | Focused, opinionated, polished | Functional, internal-first |
| Public feedback board | ||
| Users submit feedback | Directly, on public or embedded boards | Manually, by your team |
| Pricing model | Flat, by feature set | Per editor, plus base fee |
| Free plan | Unlimited users, forever | 14-day trial only |
| At 3 editors | $29 / month | $85 to $157 / month |
| At 5 editors | $29 to $59 / month | $131 to $235 / month |
| At 10 editors | $59 / month | $246 to $690 / month |
| Mobile-optimized interface | Desktop-centric | |
| Custom domain | Starter, $29 / month | |
| Single sign-on | Professional, $59 / month | |
| Remove vendor branding | Included on paid plans | Limited branding only |
| Revenue-based prioritization | ||
| Native CRM and support integrations | Via webhooks and API | Intercom, Salesforce, HubSpot |
| AI-drafted changelog | ||
| MCP server for AI agents | ||
| Savio import | CSV import with AI mapping |
Closing the loop
The last mile of feedback, automated.
Shipping is where most feedback tools end. It is where UserJot's work is most useful. The blank page stays closed, and the right people hear first.
Voters hear first
Everyone who voted or commented gets an email the moment you publish. The list is built for you.
Scheduled updates
Queue announcements for when your users are awake. A weekly digest gently re-engages the quieter ones.
Changelog software with AI that writes, schedules, and notifies for you.
AI changelog software that writes updates from your shipped features, schedules posts, and auto-notifies users who requested them. The in-app widget helps users discover every release the moment you publish.
AI writes complete changelogs
Tell the AI to write a changelog from closed feedback and it drafts the post, title, and tags in your voice.
Automatic user notifications
When you publish, users who voted on those features get an email automatically. No manual list management.
In-app widget
Users can read the latest changelog without leaving your product.
Update indicator
A small badge appears the moment a new changelog lands, so users never miss what shipped.
Link to feedback
Every update links back to the original feature requests and the customers who asked for them.
Schedule posts
Ask the AI to schedule for Monday at 2pm, or let it pick the right time for your audience.
“Our strategy is to stay close to our users and obsess over quality. UserJot makes that easy: one place to listen, build what users want, and keep the feedback loop short.”
“UserJot has noticeably improved our product process. Instead of piecing together feedback from support, email, and social, we have one hub to collect feedback, gauge interest, and keep users updated on improvements. It's helped us move faster and focus on things customers actually want.”
“We set up UserJot and our users actually started leaving feedback. Clean, simple, and we finally know what to build next.”
“Ever since we added UserJot, the most common thing users mention in reviews is that we actually listen. It's helped us build a loyal community of users who feel like they're shaping the app with us.”
“We'd been looking for a feedback board for some time. Every app we found was either bloated or expensive. Userjot hits the sweet spot! The UI is next-level, and the pace of improvement has been amazing!”
Migration
A clean path out of Savio.
Savio does not publish a direct export API, so migration runs through CSV. In practice that still lands most teams on UserJot in a single working session, with the whole team invited and the public board live.
Export from Savio
Savio settings, then export to CSV. A few minutes to generate, depending on volume. No API keys or developer help required.
Import into UserJot
Paste the CSV. AI proposes the column-to-board mapping for submissions, authors, and details. Confirm it in a single pass.
Invite the whole team
Bring customer success, support, founders, whoever should be in the loop. No per-editor fees, no seat math, no tier jumps to worry about.
If your Savio data includes revenue tags, custom attributes, or linked feature IDs, reach out before you start. We will map them into UserJot tags and custom fields with you so nothing gets lost.
Pricing
Pricing that does not punish adoption.
Flat monthly pricing with unlimited users on every plan. Your bill stays the same at a hundred users or ten thousand, on quiet months or loud ones.
Free
Free, forever.
$0/ month
What's included
- Unlimited posts
- Unlimited users
- 3 admin roles
- 2 feedback boards
- Public roadmap
- Public changelog
Starter
For small teams.
$29/ month
Everything in Free, plus
- Custom domain
- Guest posting
- Automatic login
- 5 feedback boards
- Private boards
- One integration
Professional
For growing teams.
$59/ month
Everything in Starter, plus
- Unlimited boards
- Advanced search
- Single sign-on
- Unlimited integrations
- Unlimited admin roles
- Public identity masking
Try it with your team
Start a free workspace in thirty seconds.
UserJot takes about thirty seconds to stand up and a few minutes to import a Savio CSV. If the loop feels clearer to you, keep it. If it does not, you have spent less time than reading this page.
Start free
Free forever. No credit card. Unlimited editors from day one.
Questions
The ones that come up before teams switch.
Pricing math, migration, the public-vs-internal question, MRR prioritization, and where Savio is genuinely the stronger tool. Answered plainly.
Shape, not scope. Savio is an internal inbox for feedback forwarded in from Intercom, Help Scout, Slack, and email. Your team curates it, tags it, and prioritizes by MRR. UserJot is a public board where customers submit, vote, and comment directly. Both are real, defensible products. They just start from different assumptions about who is holding the pen.
For some teams, not at all. If your PMs trust customer success to filter feedback and you never want a public roadmap, the inbox model works. For most teams, the absence is the biggest friction in the tool. Every piece of feedback has to be rewritten by somebody internal, vote counts are estimates rather than measurements, and customers never see the loop close. UserJot removes the handoff. Submissions arrive in the words customers used, with votes already attached.
Savio charges a base fee per tier plus a flat rate per additional editor. Essential is $39 per month plus $23 per editor. Professional is $79 plus $39. Business is $249 plus $49. A five-editor team on Professional pays $235 per month. A ten-editor team on Business pays $690. UserJot is flat. Starter is $29 per month, Professional is $59, and neither moves when you invite more teammates. The math diverges quickly.
Not directly, and this is worth naming honestly. Savio ties feedback to customer records and shows aggregate MRR behind each request. It is a genuine differentiator for B2B teams whose prioritization runs through revenue segments. UserJot prioritizes by vote count, segment filters, and custom attributes. For teams where a handful of large accounts dominate the roadmap, Savio will serve you better. For teams where breadth of signal matters more than revenue weighting, UserJot is a cleaner fit.
It is, and we will not pretend otherwise. Savio has a native Intercom integration that pipes support conversations straight into feedback with full context preserved. UserJot does not match that depth out of the box. We do support Intercom-style workflows through webhooks and our REST API, and teams running a Zapier or a small glue layer get most of the way there. If your whole feedback practice runs through Intercom today, Savio is the path of least resistance.
Same answer, shorter. Savio has first-class CRM integrations. UserJot covers CRM use cases through webhooks and the API, which works well for pushing prioritized items into existing sales workflows but does not replicate Savio's revenue-aware prioritization on its own. If CRM sync is the feature driving your shortlist, Savio is the stronger tool.
B2B SaaS companies where feedback lives in Intercom, where customer success owns the collection step, and where the PM team prioritizes by MRR. That is what Savio was designed for and it remains a defensible choice for that exact shape. UserJot is built for teams who want customers in the room, roadmaps visible, and a loop that includes the people giving the feedback. Pick the tool that matches the shape of the team, not the other way around.
Yes. Export from Savio to CSV, paste it into UserJot, and our importer uses AI to propose the column-to-board mapping for submissions, authors, and details. You confirm it in a single pass. For anything custom (revenue tags, segment attributes, linked feature IDs), reach out and we will map it with you. Most migrations finish in well under an hour.
No, and we made that choice deliberately. Savio's Chrome extension exists because feedback has to be entered internally. UserJot avoids that step entirely. Customers post on the public board, through the in-app widget, through guest submissions, or through the API. There is no feedback-capture workflow for admins because there is no gap to fill.
Yes, and it is the part of the product we are proudest of. When you move a Post to Completed, UserJot drafts the changelog announcement from the original request and the discussion around it. Publishing notifies every voter and commenter automatically, by email and through the in-app widget. Savio has close-the-loop tooling, but it is an internal send flow. Ours is a public-facing announcement system built into the same surface as the feedback.
Yes. Professional ($59 per month) includes SAML SSO. Automatic Login (a JWT-based flow for in-app identification) is available on Starter and Professional. Savio does not offer SSO on any tier, which is a material gap for teams with security review.
Thirty seconds from signup to a live board. Pick a workspace name, share the link. No configurations sit between you and the first piece of feedback. If you are importing from Savio, add a few minutes to run the CSV through our importer.